public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox•com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch>
Cc: "netdev@vger•kernel.org" <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox•com>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox•com>,
	"davem@davemloft•net" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox•com>,
	"jakub.kicinski@netronome•com" <jakub.kicinski@netronome•com>,
	"stephen@networkplumber•org" <stephen@networkplumber•org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: rtnetlink: Add link-down reason to RTNL messages
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:15:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhpsgw7j.fsf@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190316022658.GC29548@lunn.ch>


Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch> writes:

>> +enum rtnl_link_down_reason_major {
>> +	RTNL_LDR_OTHER,
>
> Does 'other' make any sense? Seem better to just not report anything
> at all, or add a comment that more reasons should be added at the end
> to reflect whatever the hardware or software can determine.

You still have the minor code to give you some information.

>> +	RTNL_LDR_NO_CABLE,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_UNSUPPORTED_CABLE,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_AUTONEG_FAILURE,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_NO_LINK_PARTNER,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_LINK_TRAINING_FAILURE,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_LOGICAL_MISMATCH,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_REMOTE_FAULT,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_BAD_SIGNAL_INTEGRITY,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_CALIBRATION_FAILURE,
>> +	RTNL_LDR_POWER_BUDGET_EXCEEDED,
>> +};
>
> What about SFP cage empty?, i.e. no SFP, SFP+ module in the cage?  An

No cable? Maybe the name needs to change...

> SFP can also report LOS. That does not appear to be any of the above.
> Or that the core SFP code has been unable to read the EEPROM? We have

My assumption was that cable with unreadable EEPROM is simply a bad
cable. Does the admin actually care which particular part of the cable
is at fault?

> people reporting this problem at the moment. We also have that the
> SERDES has not yet obtained sync to its peer, which you know from
> phylink_mac_change. That probably means the peer is using a different
> bit rate.

We can add this.

> I think it would be good if you handle the general case errors which
> phylib and phylink can report, as well as the proprietary cases your
> driver can report. We don't want this to be a Mellanox only API.

Sure, I'll take a look at that. I didn't need to deal with PHY so far,
so I need to figure out what's what.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-18 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-15 17:56 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] RTNL: Add link-down reason reporting Petr Machata
2019-03-15 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: rtnetlink: Add link-down reason to RTNL messages Petr Machata
2019-03-16  2:26   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-17  0:24     ` Michal Kubecek
2019-03-18 12:34     ` Petr Machata
2019-03-18 12:43       ` Michal Kubecek
2019-03-18 13:12       ` Andrew Lunn
2019-03-16  2:26   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-03-18 13:15     ` Petr Machata [this message]
2019-03-18 13:33       ` Andrew Lunn
2019-03-18 13:47         ` Petr Machata
2019-03-18 14:02       ` Andrew Lunn
2019-03-18 15:52         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-19 10:18           ` Petr Machata
2019-03-19 11:56             ` Michal Kubecek
2019-03-19 15:42             ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-19 15:57               ` Petr Machata
2019-03-17 22:38   ` Roopa Prabhu
2019-03-18  0:03     ` Andrew Lunn
2019-03-28 17:59       ` Petr Machata
2019-03-28 19:51         ` Andrew Lunn
2019-04-23 13:41           ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-18 12:15     ` Petr Machata
2019-03-15 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/3] mlxsw: reg: Add Port Diagnostics Database Register Petr Machata
2019-03-15 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] mlxsw: spectrum: Add rtnl_link_ops Petr Machata
2019-03-16  2:06 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] RTNL: Add link-down reason reporting Andrew Lunn
2019-03-18 12:11   ` Petr Machata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zhpsgw7j.fsf@mellanox.com \
    --to=petrm@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=idosch@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber$(echo .)org \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox