From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail•com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall•org>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail•com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat•com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google•com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia•com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia•com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 1/3] bonding: add common function to check ipsec device
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:43:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsMFspiLZojq3EIO@Laptop-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a60116a2-bcbd-4d0f-9cfb-7717c188e26f@blackwall.org>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 11:02:14AM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > +static struct net_device bond_ipsec_dev(struct xfrm_state *xs)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
> > + struct net_device *real_dev;
> > + struct bonding *bond;
> > + struct slave *slave;
> > +
> > + if (!bond_dev)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> > + slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> > + real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
> > +
> > + if ((BOND_MODE(bond) != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ||
> > + !slave || !real_dev || !xs->xso.real_dev)
> > + return NULL;
>
> No need to check !slave again here. !real_dev implies !slave and
> vice-versa, if it is set then we must have had a slave.
Ah yes, I missed this.
> I prefer the more obvious way - check slave after deref and
> bail out, similar to my fix, I think it is easier to follow the
> code and more obvious. Although I don't feel strong about that
> it's just a preference. :)
I don't have a inclination, I just want to check all the error and fail out.
If we check each one separately, do you think if I should do like
if (!bond_dev)
return NULL;
bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
if (BOND_MODE(bond) != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP)
return NULL;
slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
if (!slave)
return NULL;
> > + WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != slave->dev);
Here as you said, the WARN_ON would be triggered easily, do you think if I
should change to pr_warn or salve_warn?
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-19 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-19 7:53 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/2] Bonding: support new xfrm state offload functions Hangbin Liu
2024-08-19 7:53 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/3] bonding: add common function to check ipsec device Hangbin Liu
2024-08-19 8:02 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2024-08-19 8:43 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2024-08-19 8:48 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2024-08-19 14:37 ` Simon Horman
2024-08-19 23:07 ` Hangbin Liu
2024-08-19 19:24 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-19 20:16 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-19 7:53 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/3] bonding: Add ESN support to IPSec HW offload Hangbin Liu
2024-08-19 8:03 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2024-08-19 21:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-19 23:01 ` Hangbin Liu
2024-08-19 7:53 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 3/3] bonding: support xfrm state update Hangbin Liu
2024-08-19 8:03 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2024-08-19 8:43 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 0/2] Bonding: support new xfrm state offload functions Nikolay Aleksandrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsMFspiLZojq3EIO@Laptop-X1 \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=j.vosburgh@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=jianbol@nvidia$(echo .)com \
--cc=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=razor@blackwall$(echo .)org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail$(echo .)net \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox