public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail•com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google•com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat•com>,
	donald.hunter@redhat•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tools: ynl: Add struct parsing to nlspec
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:38:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2bkklj9t2.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230321222245.48328d8b@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:22:45 -0700")

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org> writes:

> On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 19:37:59 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote:
>> +class SpecStructMember(SpecElement):
>> +    """Struct member attribute
>> +
>> +    Represents a single struct member attribute.
>> +
>> +    Attributes:
>> +        type    string, kernel type of the member attribute
>
> We can have structs inside structs in theory, or "binary blobs" so this
> is really a subset of what attr can be rather than necessarily a kernel
> type?

Okay, so the schema currently defines the member types as u*, s* and
string. Does it make sense to add 'binary' and 'struct'?

To be clear, do you want me to drop the word 'kernel' from the
docstring, or something more?

>> +    """
>> +    def __init__(self, family, yaml):
>> +        super().__init__(family, yaml)
>> +        self.type = yaml['type']
>> +
>
> nit: double new line

Ack.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-22 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-19 19:37 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] ynl: add support for user headers and struct attrs Donald Hunter
2023-03-19 19:37 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] tools: ynl: Fix genlmsg header encoding formats Donald Hunter
2023-03-19 19:37 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tools: ynl: Add struct parsing to nlspec Donald Hunter
2023-03-22  5:22   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 11:38     ` Donald Hunter [this message]
2023-03-22 18:25       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-19 19:38 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] tools: ynl: Add array-nest attr decoding to ynl Donald Hunter
2023-03-22  5:18   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 11:27     ` Donald Hunter
2023-03-22 18:27       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-19 19:38 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] tools: ynl: Add struct " Donald Hunter
2023-03-22  5:30   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 11:48     ` Donald Hunter
2023-03-22 18:37       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 22:06         ` Donald Hunter
2023-03-19 19:38 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] tools: ynl: Add fixed-header support " Donald Hunter
2023-03-22  5:34   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 11:54     ` Donald Hunter
2023-03-19 19:38 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] netlink: specs: add partial specification for openvswitch Donald Hunter
2023-03-23  3:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] ynl: add support for user headers and struct attrs patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2bkklj9t2.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=donald.hunter@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox