public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei•com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix•de>
Cc: <linux-rockchip@lists•infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech•de>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung•com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung•com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel•org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm•com>, <kernel@pengutronix•de>,
	Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add SoC specific init function
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 16:40:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230516164017.00002774@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230505113856.463650-5-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

On Fri,  5 May 2023 13:38:39 +0200
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix•de> wrote:

> Move the RK3399 specifics to a SoC specific init function to make
> the way free for supporting other SoCs later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix•de>
Hi Sascha,

A few things inline,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> index 47cc9e48dafab..f317d3d063e9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  
>  #include <soc/rockchip/rk3399_grf.h>
>  
> @@ -55,27 +56,21 @@ struct rockchip_dfi {
>  	void __iomem *regs;
>  	struct regmap *regmap_pmu;
>  	struct clk *clk;
> +	u32 ddr_type;
>  };
>  
>  static void rockchip_dfi_start_hardware_counter(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  {
>  	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
>  	void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> -	u32 val;
> -	u32 ddr_type;
> -
> -	/* get ddr type */
> -	regmap_read(dfi->regmap_pmu, RK3399_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, &val);
> -	ddr_type = (val >> RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_SHIFT) &
> -		    RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_MASK;
>  
>  	/* clear DDRMON_CTRL setting */
>  	writel_relaxed(CLR_DDRMON_CTRL, dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
>  
>  	/* set ddr type to dfi */
> -	if (ddr_type == RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3)
> +	if (dfi->ddr_type == RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3)
>  		writel_relaxed(LPDDR3_EN, dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> -	else if (ddr_type == RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4)
> +	else if (dfi->ddr_type == RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4)
>  		writel_relaxed(LPDDR4_EN, dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
>  
>  	/* enable count, use software mode */
> @@ -167,8 +162,34 @@ static const struct devfreq_event_ops rockchip_dfi_ops = {
>  	.set_event = rockchip_dfi_set_event,
>  };
>  
> +static int rk3399_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> +{
> +	struct regmap *regmap_pmu = dfi->regmap_pmu;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	dfi->clk = devm_clk_get(dfi->dev, "pclk_ddr_mon");
> +	if (IS_ERR(dfi->clk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dfi->dev, PTR_ERR(dfi->clk),
> +				     "Cannot get the clk pclk_ddr_mon\n");
> +
> +	/* get ddr type */
> +	regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3399_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, &val);
> +	dfi->ddr_type = (val >> RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_SHIFT) &
> +			RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_MASK;

I don't suppose you fancy converting whole driver to
FIELD_GET / FIELD_PREP and masks that include the shift? :)
Guess probably not or maybe you do it later in this set.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +};
> +
> +struct rockchip_dfi_devtype_data {
> +	int (*init)(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi);
> +};
> +
> +static struct rockchip_dfi_devtype_data rk3399_devtype_data = {
> +	.init = rk3399_dfi_init,

I guess the 'why' will become apparent later in the set, but at this
stage a callback to get the ddr type would have made more sense and
kept the data local to where it was needed.

> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id rockchip_dfi_id_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-dfi" },
> +	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-dfi", .data = &rk3399_devtype_data },
>  	{ },
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_dfi_id_match);
> @@ -179,6 +200,15 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi;
>  	struct devfreq_event_desc *desc;
>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *node;
> +	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> +	const struct rockchip_dfi_devtype_data *devtype;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	of_id = of_match_device(rockchip_dfi_id_match, &pdev->dev);
> +	if (!of_id)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	devtype = of_id->data;

device_get_match_data()

or I guess if you really want stick to the of specific form.

of_device_get_match_data()


>  
>  	dfi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dfi), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!dfi)
> @@ -188,11 +218,6 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(dfi->regs))
>  		return PTR_ERR(dfi->regs);
>  
> -	dfi->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk_ddr_mon");
> -	if (IS_ERR(dfi->clk))
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dfi->clk),
> -				     "Cannot get the clk pclk_ddr_mon\n");
> -
>  	node = of_parse_phandle(np, "rockchip,pmu", 0);
>  	if (!node)
>  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV, "Can't find pmu_grf registers\n");
> @@ -208,6 +233,10 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	desc->driver_data = dfi;
>  	desc->name = np->name;
>  
> +	ret = devtype->init(dfi);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	dfi->edev = devm_devfreq_event_add_edev(&pdev->dev, desc);
>  	if (IS_ERR(dfi->edev)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev,


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-16 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-05 11:38 [PATCH v4 00/21] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Embed desc into private data struct Sascha Hauer
2023-05-07 10:08   ` Heiko Stübner
2023-05-16 15:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: use consistent name for " Sascha Hauer
2023-05-07 10:22   ` Heiko Stübner
2023-05-16 15:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Make pmu regmap mandatory Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 15:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add SoC specific init function Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 15:40   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-05-17  9:20     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 10:19       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: dfi store raw values in counter struct Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 15:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Use free running counter Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 15:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-17  9:29     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: introduce channel mask Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 15:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-17  9:33     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc,dfi: generalize DDRTYPE defines Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 15:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-17 10:51     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Clean up DDR type register defines Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 16:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-17 11:11     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add RK3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 16:04   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-17 11:38     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 14:46       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR2 correctly Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 16:06   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR4X Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 16:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-19  6:14     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Pass private data struct to internal functions Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 16:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Prepare for multiple users Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 16:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add perf support Sascha Hauer
     [not found]   ` <71827018-8e29-2966-380b-66ddfdcd3668@arm.com>
2023-05-16 15:27     ` Sascha Hauer
     [not found]     ` <20230510195634.GH29365@pengutronix.de>
2023-05-16 15:39       ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 10:53   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-17 14:26     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: make register stride SoC specific Sascha Hauer
2023-05-16 16:18   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-19  6:45     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: account for multiple DDRMON_CTRL registers Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 10:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for RK3588 Sascha Hauer
2023-05-17 10:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: Enable DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk356x: Add DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml Sascha Hauer
2023-05-05 16:29   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-05 16:31     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-05 16:38 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver Vincent Legoll

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230516164017.00002774@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei$(echo .)com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech$(echo .)de \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix$(echo .)de \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision$(echo .)net \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung$(echo .)com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix$(echo .)de \
    --cc=will@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox