* getting fixmap patches in linux-next
@ 2013-12-11 15:25 Mark Salter
2013-12-11 15:40 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Salter @ 2013-12-11 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, mingo
Hi, I have cleanup of fixmap.h here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/474
Most of the series has been ack'd with the notable exception
of the arch/x86 part. I'd like to get this series into linux-next
but I'm not sure of the best way. I could put it in the c6x tree
but it doesn't belong there and I don't want to put the x86 patch
in there without any acks. I've cc'd Ingo thinking the tip tree
may be the place it should go.
--Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: getting fixmap patches in linux-next
2013-12-11 15:25 getting fixmap patches in linux-next Mark Salter
@ 2013-12-11 15:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-11 15:55 ` Mark Salter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2013-12-11 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Salter; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, mingo, Andrew Morton
* Mark Salter <msalter@redhat•com> wrote:
> Hi, I have cleanup of fixmap.h here:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/474
>
> Most of the series has been ack'd with the notable exception
> of the arch/x86 part. [...]
It didn't look controversial to me:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>
> [...] I'd like to get this series into linux-next but I'm not sure
> of the best way. I could put it in the c6x tree but it doesn't
> belong there and I don't want to put the x86 patch in there without
> any acks. I've cc'd Ingo thinking the tip tree may be the place it
> should go.
I think akpm is usually collecting such generic arch and kmap patches
- mind pinging him whether he'd like to take it into -mm?
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: getting fixmap patches in linux-next
2013-12-11 15:40 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2013-12-11 15:55 ` Mark Salter
2013-12-11 20:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-11 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Salter @ 2013-12-11 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, mingo, Andrew Morton
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mark Salter <msalter@redhat•com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I have cleanup of fixmap.h here:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/474
> >
> > Most of the series has been ack'd with the notable exception
> > of the arch/x86 part. [...]
>
> It didn't look controversial to me:
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>
>
> > [...] I'd like to get this series into linux-next but I'm not sure
> > of the best way. I could put it in the c6x tree but it doesn't
> > belong there and I don't want to put the x86 patch in there without
> > any acks. I've cc'd Ingo thinking the tip tree may be the place it
> > should go.
>
> I think akpm is usually collecting such generic arch and kmap patches
> - mind pinging him whether he'd like to take it into -mm?
Thanks, will do.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: getting fixmap patches in linux-next
2013-12-11 15:55 ` Mark Salter
@ 2013-12-11 20:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-11 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-12-11 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Salter; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-next, mingo, Andrew Morton
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1351 bytes --]
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:55:59 -0500 Mark Salter <msalter@redhat•com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Mark Salter <msalter@redhat•com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, I have cleanup of fixmap.h here:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/474
> > >
> > > Most of the series has been ack'd with the notable exception
> > > of the arch/x86 part. [...]
> >
> > It didn't look controversial to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>
> >
> > > [...] I'd like to get this series into linux-next but I'm not sure
> > > of the best way. I could put it in the c6x tree but it doesn't
> > > belong there and I don't want to put the x86 patch in there without
> > > any acks. I've cc'd Ingo thinking the tip tree may be the place it
> > > should go.
> >
> > I think akpm is usually collecting such generic arch and kmap patches
> > - mind pinging him whether he'd like to take it into -mm?
>
> Thanks, will do.
If this is available as a git tree and is pretty stable (i.e. ready for
inclusion by Linus), I could just include that tree into linux-next now
and you could send it to Linus directly when the next merge window opens.
I often have short lived project trees in linux-next.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: getting fixmap patches in linux-next
2013-12-11 15:55 ` Mark Salter
2013-12-11 20:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2013-12-11 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-12 15:11 ` Mark Salter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2013-12-11 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Salter; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, mingo
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:55:59 -0500 Mark Salter <msalter@redhat•com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Mark Salter <msalter@redhat•com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, I have cleanup of fixmap.h here:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/474
> > >
> > > Most of the series has been ack'd with the notable exception
> > > of the arch/x86 part. [...]
> >
> > It didn't look controversial to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>
> >
> > > [...] I'd like to get this series into linux-next but I'm not sure
> > > of the best way. I could put it in the c6x tree but it doesn't
> > > belong there and I don't want to put the x86 patch in there without
> > > any acks. I've cc'd Ingo thinking the tip tree may be the place it
> > > should go.
> >
> > I think akpm is usually collecting such generic arch and kmap patches
> > - mind pinging him whether he'd like to take it into -mm?
>
> Thanks, will do.
It seems that "[PATCH 03/11] arm: use generic fixmap.h" has issues?
If/when that gets resolved, please integrate all the reviewed-by's and
acked-by's and cc me on the resend?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: getting fixmap patches in linux-next
2013-12-11 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2013-12-12 15:11 ` Mark Salter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Salter @ 2013-12-12 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, mingo
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:01 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It seems that "[PATCH 03/11] arm: use generic fixmap.h" has issues?
>
> If/when that gets resolved, please integrate all the reviewed-by's and
> acked-by's and cc me on the resend?
The posted v2 of that patch shouldn't have any issues. The kmap
interfaces which would be effected by the change have been tested.
I pinged the arm folks on it, so let's see if they have anything
to say about it.
--Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-12 15:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-11 15:25 getting fixmap patches in linux-next Mark Salter
2013-12-11 15:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-11 15:55 ` Mark Salter
2013-12-11 20:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-11 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-12 15:11 ` Mark Salter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox