* next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815)
@ 2017-08-15 10:49 Build bot for Mark Brown
2017-08-15 11:16 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Build bot for Mark Brown @ 2017-08-15 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-build-reports, linaro-kernel, linux-next
Tree/Branch: next-20170815
Git describe: next-20170815
Commit: 497247033e Add linux-next specific files for 20170815
Build Time: 78 min 48 sec
Passed: 8 / 10 ( 80.00 %)
Failed: 2 / 10 ( 20.00 %)
Errors: 2
Warnings: 4
Section Mismatches: 0
Failed defconfigs:
arm64-allmodconfig
arm64-defconfig
Errors:
arm64-allmodconfig
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
arm64-defconfig
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
defconfigs with issues (other than build errors):
1 warnings 0 mismatches : x86_64-allnoconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : arm64-allmodconfig
2 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-allmodconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : arm64-defconfig
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Errors summary: 2
2 ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
2 ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
Warnings Summary: 4
2 ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:34:13: warning: 'qdf2400_erratum_44_present' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1 ../drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c:883:1: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
1 ../drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:827:1: warning: the frame size of 1248 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
1 ../arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:305:13: warning: 'legacy_fixup_core_id' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
===============================================================================
Detailed per-defconfig build reports below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64-allnoconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:305:13: warning: 'legacy_fixup_core_id' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm64-allmodconfig : FAIL, 2 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Errors:
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
Warnings:
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:34:13: warning: 'qdf2400_erratum_44_present' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:827:1: warning: the frame size of 1248 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
../drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c:883:1: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm64-defconfig : FAIL, 2 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Errors:
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
Warnings:
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:34:13: warning: 'qdf2400_erratum_44_present' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches:
arm64-allnoconfig
arm-multi_v5_defconfig
arm-multi_v7_defconfig
x86_64-defconfig
arm-allnoconfig
arm-multi_v4t_defconfig
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815)
2017-08-15 10:49 next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815) Build bot for Mark Brown
@ 2017-08-15 11:16 ` Mark Brown
2017-08-15 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2017-08-15 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: kernel-build-reports, linaro-kernel, linux-next, Len Brown,
linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 426 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
Today's -next fails to build on arm64 due to:
> arm64-allmodconfig
> arm64-defconfig
> ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
> ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
caused by f69ba1326ac33b (Merge branch 'acpi-spcr' into linux-next)
which has an unresolved conflict in it.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815)
2017-08-15 11:16 ` Mark Brown
@ 2017-08-15 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-16 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-08-15 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, kernel-build-reports, linaro-kernel,
linux-next, Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 1:16:12 PM CEST Mark Brown wrote:
>
> --xqegarazqzvkdxmo
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
>
> Today's -next fails to build on arm64 due to:
>
> > arm64-allmodconfig
> > arm64-defconfig
> > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
> > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
>
> caused by f69ba1326ac33b (Merge branch 'acpi-spcr' into linux-next)
> which has an unresolved conflict in it.
Yes, I broke this, sorry.
Will fix it shortly.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815)
2017-08-15 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2017-08-16 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-16 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-08-16 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Mark Brown, linaro-kernel, kernel-build-reports,
Rafael J. Wysocki, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux-Next,
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org, Len Brown
Hi Rafael,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki•net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 1:16:12 PM CEST Mark Brown wrote:
>> --xqegarazqzvkdxmo
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Disposition: inline
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> Today's -next fails to build on arm64 due to:
>>
>> > arm64-allmodconfig
>> > arm64-defconfig
>> > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
>> > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
>>
>> caused by f69ba1326ac33b (Merge branch 'acpi-spcr' into linux-next)
>> which has an unresolved conflict in it.
>
> Yes, I broke this, sorry.
>
> Will fix it shortly.
The rebased version (fix?) lacks a curly opening brace.
Gmail-whitespace-damaged patch to fold into the bad version below.
>From f5d55ccb53f02b67be52962d727bdfe3fff14afb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider•be>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:17:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] CPI: SPCR: Add missing opening brace
drivers/acpi/spcr.c: In function 'parse_spcr':
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:165:3: error: label 'done' used but not defined
goto done;
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c: At top level:
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:201:4: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'else'
} else {
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:206:9: error: expected declaration specifiers or
'...' before string constant
pr_info("console: %s\n", opts);
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:206:52: error: unknown type name 'opts'
pr_info("console: %s\n", opts);
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:208:2: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'if'
if (earlycon)
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:211:2: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
err = add_preferred_console(uart, 0, opts + strlen(uart) + 1);
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:211:2: error: type defaults to 'int' in
declaration of 'err' [-Werror=implicit-int]
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:211:30: error: 'uart' undeclared here (not in a function)
err = add_preferred_console(uart, 0, opts + strlen(uart) + 1);
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:211:39: error: 'opts' undeclared here (not in a function)
err = add_preferred_console(uart, 0, opts + strlen(uart) + 1);
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:213:5: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before ':' token
done:
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:215:2: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
return err;
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:216:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
}
^
drivers/acpi/spcr.c: In function 'parse_spcr':
drivers/acpi/spcr.c:201:2: warning: control reaches end of non-void
function [-Wreturn-type]
} else {
^
Fixes: fd46b1aebee729fb ("ACPI: SPCR: work around clock issue on xgene UART")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider•be>
---
drivers/acpi/spcr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/spcr.c b/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
index 617003032415e09e..324b35bfe781d42a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/spcr.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int __init parse_spcr(bool earlycon)
uart = "qdf2400_e44";
}
- if (xgene_8250_erratum_present(table))
+ if (xgene_8250_erratum_present(table)) {
iotype = "mmio32";
/* for xgene v1 and v2 we don't know the clock rate of the
--
2.7.4
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k•org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815)
2017-08-16 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2017-08-16 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-08-16 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Mark Brown, linaro-kernel, kernel-build-reports,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux-Next,
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org, Len Brown
On 8/16/2017 3:19 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki•net> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 1:16:12 PM CEST Mark Brown wrote:
>>> --xqegarazqzvkdxmo
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>> Content-Disposition: inline
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's -next fails to build on arm64 due to:
>>>
>>>> arm64-allmodconfig
>>>> arm64-defconfig
>>>> ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
>>>> ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
>>> caused by f69ba1326ac33b (Merge branch 'acpi-spcr' into linux-next)
>>> which has an unresolved conflict in it.
>> Yes, I broke this, sorry.
>>
>> Will fix it shortly.
> The rebased version (fix?) lacks a curly opening brace.
> Gmail-whitespace-damaged patch to fold into the bad version below.
OK, should be fixed now.
Sorry for breaking it again.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-16 17:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-08-15 10:49 next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815) Build bot for Mark Brown
2017-08-15 11:16 ` Mark Brown
2017-08-15 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-16 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-16 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox