* next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815)
@ 2017-08-15 10:49 Build bot for Mark Brown
2017-08-15 11:16 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Build bot for Mark Brown @ 2017-08-15 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-build-reports, linaro-kernel, linux-next
Tree/Branch: next-20170815
Git describe: next-20170815
Commit: 497247033e Add linux-next specific files for 20170815
Build Time: 78 min 48 sec
Passed: 8 / 10 ( 80.00 %)
Failed: 2 / 10 ( 20.00 %)
Errors: 2
Warnings: 4
Section Mismatches: 0
Failed defconfigs:
arm64-allmodconfig
arm64-defconfig
Errors:
arm64-allmodconfig
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
arm64-defconfig
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
defconfigs with issues (other than build errors):
1 warnings 0 mismatches : x86_64-allnoconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : arm64-allmodconfig
2 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-allmodconfig
1 warnings 0 mismatches : arm64-defconfig
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Errors summary: 2
2 ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
2 ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
Warnings Summary: 4
2 ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:34:13: warning: 'qdf2400_erratum_44_present' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1 ../drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c:883:1: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
1 ../drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:827:1: warning: the frame size of 1248 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
1 ../arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:305:13: warning: 'legacy_fixup_core_id' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
===============================================================================
Detailed per-defconfig build reports below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64-allnoconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:305:13: warning: 'legacy_fixup_core_id' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm64-allmodconfig : FAIL, 2 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Errors:
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
Warnings:
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:34:13: warning: 'qdf2400_erratum_44_present' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm-allmodconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Warnings:
../drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:827:1: warning: the frame size of 1248 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
../drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c:883:1: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
arm64-defconfig : FAIL, 2 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches
Errors:
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token
Warnings:
../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:34:13: warning: 'qdf2400_erratum_44_present' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches:
arm64-allnoconfig
arm-multi_v5_defconfig
arm-multi_v7_defconfig
x86_64-defconfig
arm-allnoconfig
arm-multi_v4t_defconfig
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815) 2017-08-15 10:49 next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815) Build bot for Mark Brown @ 2017-08-15 11:16 ` Mark Brown 2017-08-15 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2017-08-15 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: kernel-build-reports, linaro-kernel, linux-next, Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 426 bytes --] On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: Today's -next fails to build on arm64 due to: > arm64-allmodconfig > arm64-defconfig > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token caused by f69ba1326ac33b (Merge branch 'acpi-spcr' into linux-next) which has an unresolved conflict in it. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815) 2017-08-15 11:16 ` Mark Brown @ 2017-08-15 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2017-08-16 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-08-15 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, kernel-build-reports, linaro-kernel, linux-next, Len Brown, linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 1:16:12 PM CEST Mark Brown wrote: > > --xqegarazqzvkdxmo > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > > Today's -next fails to build on arm64 due to: > > > arm64-allmodconfig > > arm64-defconfig > > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token > > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token > > caused by f69ba1326ac33b (Merge branch 'acpi-spcr' into linux-next) > which has an unresolved conflict in it. Yes, I broke this, sorry. Will fix it shortly. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815) 2017-08-15 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-08-16 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2017-08-16 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-08-16 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Mark Brown, linaro-kernel, kernel-build-reports, Rafael J. Wysocki, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux-Next, linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org, Len Brown Hi Rafael, On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki•net> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 1:16:12 PM CEST Mark Brown wrote: >> --xqegarazqzvkdxmo >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> Content-Disposition: inline >> >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: >> >> Today's -next fails to build on arm64 due to: >> >> > arm64-allmodconfig >> > arm64-defconfig >> > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token >> > ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token >> >> caused by f69ba1326ac33b (Merge branch 'acpi-spcr' into linux-next) >> which has an unresolved conflict in it. > > Yes, I broke this, sorry. > > Will fix it shortly. The rebased version (fix?) lacks a curly opening brace. Gmail-whitespace-damaged patch to fold into the bad version below. >From f5d55ccb53f02b67be52962d727bdfe3fff14afb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider•be> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:17:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] CPI: SPCR: Add missing opening brace drivers/acpi/spcr.c: In function 'parse_spcr': drivers/acpi/spcr.c:165:3: error: label 'done' used but not defined goto done; ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c: At top level: drivers/acpi/spcr.c:201:4: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'else' } else { ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:206:9: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant pr_info("console: %s\n", opts); ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:206:52: error: unknown type name 'opts' pr_info("console: %s\n", opts); ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:208:2: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'if' if (earlycon) ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:211:2: warning: data definition has no type or storage class err = add_preferred_console(uart, 0, opts + strlen(uart) + 1); ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:211:2: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'err' [-Werror=implicit-int] drivers/acpi/spcr.c:211:30: error: 'uart' undeclared here (not in a function) err = add_preferred_console(uart, 0, opts + strlen(uart) + 1); ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:211:39: error: 'opts' undeclared here (not in a function) err = add_preferred_console(uart, 0, opts + strlen(uart) + 1); ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:213:5: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token done: ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:215:2: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return' return err; ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c:216:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token } ^ drivers/acpi/spcr.c: In function 'parse_spcr': drivers/acpi/spcr.c:201:2: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } else { ^ Fixes: fd46b1aebee729fb ("ACPI: SPCR: work around clock issue on xgene UART") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider•be> --- drivers/acpi/spcr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/spcr.c b/drivers/acpi/spcr.c index 617003032415e09e..324b35bfe781d42a 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/spcr.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/spcr.c @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int __init parse_spcr(bool earlycon) uart = "qdf2400_e44"; } - if (xgene_8250_erratum_present(table)) + if (xgene_8250_erratum_present(table)) { iotype = "mmio32"; /* for xgene v1 and v2 we don't know the clock rate of the -- 2.7.4 Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k•org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815) 2017-08-16 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-08-16 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-08-16 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven, Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Mark Brown, linaro-kernel, kernel-build-reports, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux-Next, linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org, Len Brown On 8/16/2017 3:19 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki•net> wrote: >> On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 1:16:12 PM CEST Mark Brown wrote: >>> --xqegarazqzvkdxmo >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>> Content-Disposition: inline >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:49:36AM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: >>> >>> Today's -next fails to build on arm64 due to: >>> >>>> arm64-allmodconfig >>>> arm64-defconfig >>>> ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:168:1: error: expected expression before '<<' token >>>> ../drivers/acpi/spcr.c:198:1: error: expected expression before '>>' token >>> caused by f69ba1326ac33b (Merge branch 'acpi-spcr' into linux-next) >>> which has an unresolved conflict in it. >> Yes, I broke this, sorry. >> >> Will fix it shortly. > The rebased version (fix?) lacks a curly opening brace. > Gmail-whitespace-damaged patch to fold into the bad version below. OK, should be fixed now. Sorry for breaking it again. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-16 17:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-08-15 10:49 next-20170815 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20170815) Build bot for Mark Brown 2017-08-15 11:16 ` Mark Brown 2017-08-15 11:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2017-08-16 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2017-08-16 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox