* linux-next: lblnet tree build warnings
@ 2009-03-13 5:32 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-13 16:09 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-03-13 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: linux-next
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced these
warnings:
In file included from net/ipv4/ip_options.c:26:
include/net/cipso_ipv4.h: In function 'cipso_v4_req_delattr':
include/net/cipso_ipv4.h:264: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
In file included from net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c:22:
include/net/cipso_ipv4.h: In function 'cipso_v4_req_delattr':
include/net/cipso_ipv4.h:264: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
Caused by commit d584c27edca286826e9145a3158f03e3bc81a6c0 ("netlabel:
Label incoming TCP connections correctly in SELinux"). (BTW, that commit
has no Signed-off-by.)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: lblnet tree build warnings
2009-03-13 5:32 linux-next: lblnet tree build warnings Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-03-13 16:09 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2009-03-13 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next
On Friday 13 March 2009 01:32:52 am Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced these
> warnings:
>
> In file included from net/ipv4/ip_options.c:26:
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h: In function 'cipso_v4_req_delattr':
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h:264: warning: 'return' with a value, in function
> returning void In file included from net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c:22:
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h: In function 'cipso_v4_req_delattr':
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h:264: warning: 'return' with a value, in function
> returning void
Thanks, those should now be fixed.
> Caused by commit d584c27edca286826e9145a3158f03e3bc81a6c0 ("netlabel:
> Label incoming TCP connections correctly in SELinux"). (BTW, that commit
> has no Signed-off-by.)
Yes, there are two or three patches in the lblnet-2.6_next tree that do not
currently have sign-offs. These patches are still undergoing review (RFC
patches) and I'm not yet comfortable seeing these patches hit mainline and I
found leaving off a sign-off is about the only reliable way to prevent patches
from being merged.
I've included these RFC patches in the lblnet-2.6_next tree as a way to try
and determine any merge difficulties with other upcoming work in advance as I
do expect the patches to be signed-off for the 2.6.30 window. If that goes
against the current -next policy let me know and I'll remove them.
Thanks.
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-13 16:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-13 5:32 linux-next: lblnet tree build warnings Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-13 16:09 ` Paul Moore
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox