From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel•com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:22:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908031422.28171.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090803133203.81174a8e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:32:03 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'bind_to_cpu0':
> drivers/acpi/osl.c:194: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_cpus_allowed'
>
> Caused by commit 74b5820808215f65b70b05a099d6d3c969b82689 ("ACPI: bind
> workqueues to CPU 0 to avoid SMI corruption") (from the acpi tree but now
> in Linus' tree) interacting with commit
> 17e249fb40c814a72f08c1356cb47ec9f87f81a8
> ("cpumask:remove-set_cpus_allowed") from the rr tree.
>
> I have reverted that rr tree commit for today.
Here's a patch to fix this. Since Linus' tree still contains instances
of set_cpus_allowed(), I'm guessing this patch should be added to the rr
tree?
Bjorn
ACPI: remove cpumask_t usage
set_cpus_allowed() is on the way out; replace it with
set_cpus_allowed_ptr().
Reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/6/448
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp•com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 5691f16..e196a75 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ acpi_status __init acpi_os_initialize(void)
static void bind_to_cpu0(struct work_struct *work)
{
- set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0));
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(0));
kfree(work);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-03 3:32 linux-next: rr tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-03 17:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-08-03 20:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2009-08-03 23:18 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-10 3:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-10 3:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-11 1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-14 4:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-15 3:52 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-15 4:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-17 22:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 8:03 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 9:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-12 10:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 7:48 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-11 3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-11 8:33 ` Rusty Russell
2009-09-09 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-09 14:32 ` Siarhei Liakh
2009-09-11 3:00 ` Siarhei Liakh
2009-09-15 3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-22 5:15 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-23 6:14 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-24 3:24 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-24 6:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-15 6:40 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-15 7:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-15 8:52 ` David Miller
2009-06-15 10:39 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-11 9:07 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-11 13:08 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-09 10:12 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-10 7:26 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-10 8:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-17 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-05 8:33 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-06 5:23 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-07 3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-06 3:41 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 8:12 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 15:23 ` Mike Travis
2008-12-29 21:01 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-25 6:45 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-25 11:47 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-25 12:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-27 8:11 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-24 3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-24 17:07 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-21 3:19 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-21 10:58 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-21 18:34 ` Greg KH
2008-11-20 3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 4:52 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 13:31 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-23 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-23 13:02 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-26 6:50 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-26 7:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-27 3:15 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 6:58 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25 7:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-25 8:30 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 9:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-25 6:44 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908031422.28171.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp$(echo .)com \
--cc=len.brown@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox