public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: i2c tree build warning
@ 2009-11-26  3:06 Stephen Rothwell
  2009-11-26  8:18 ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-11-26  3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Wolfram Sang

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 471 bytes --]

Hi Jean,

Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) produced this warning:

drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c: In function 'at24_eeprom_read':
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c:230: warning: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 6 has type 'int'

Introduced by commit 39bfab2519e6f148f2508d719f9fc5f4581aeefd ("at24: Use
timeout also for read").
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: i2c tree build warning
  2009-11-26  3:06 linux-next: i2c tree build warning Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-11-26  8:18 ` Jean Delvare
  2009-11-26  8:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
  2009-11-26 10:50   ` Wolfram Sang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2009-11-26  8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Wolfram Sang

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:06:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c: In function 'at24_eeprom_read':
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c:230: warning: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 6 has type 'int'
> 
> Introduced by commit 39bfab2519e6f148f2508d719f9fc5f4581aeefd ("at24: Use
> timeout also for read").

Thanks for reporting. The warning did not show on my 32-bit x86 system,
and I guess it did not show on Wolfram's system either, otherwise we'd
have fixed it.

Does the following patch fix the warning for you?

--- linux-2.6.32-rc8.orig/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c	2009-11-26 09:14:45.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.32-rc8/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c	2009-11-26 09:14:15.000000000 +0100
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static ssize_t at24_eeprom_read(struct a
 			if (status == 2)
 				status = count;
 		}
-		dev_dbg(&client->dev, "read %zu@%d --> %zd (%ld)\n",
+		dev_dbg(&client->dev, "read %zu@%d --> %d (%ld)\n",
 				count, offset, status, jiffies);
 
 		if (status == count)

If it does then I'll merge this into Wolfram's patch.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: i2c tree build warning
  2009-11-26  8:18 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2009-11-26  8:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
  2009-11-26 10:50   ` Wolfram Sang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-11-26  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Wolfram Sang

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 433 bytes --]

Hi Jean,

On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:18:29 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr•org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for reporting. The warning did not show on my 32-bit x86 system,
> and I guess it did not show on Wolfram's system either, otherwise we'd
> have fixed it.
> 
> Does the following patch fix the warning for you?

Yes.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: i2c tree build warning
  2009-11-26  8:18 ` Jean Delvare
  2009-11-26  8:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-11-26 10:50   ` Wolfram Sang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2009-11-26 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 526 bytes --]

> Thanks for reporting. The warning did not show on my 32-bit x86 system,
> and I guess it did not show on Wolfram's system either, otherwise we'd
> have fixed it.

Yes, I tested it on a few embedded boards which are all 32-bit. Will try to get
a 64-bit machine into my test-process. Sorry for this!

Thank you Stephen for reporting and Jean for helping out!

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-26 10:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-26  3:06 linux-next: i2c tree build warning Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-26  8:18 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-26  8:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-26 10:50   ` Wolfram Sang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox