public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: clean up time (pass 1)
@ 2011-06-01  1:06 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-06-01  1:12 ` Tejun Heo
  2011-06-02  1:26 ` Phillip Lougher
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-06-01  1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-next; +Cc: LKML

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --]

Hi all,

Looking through the trees currently included in linux-next, I get the
feeling that some of them may be obsolete.

Here is a list of tree that had no commits in them at the openning of the
previous two merge windows:

linux-spec
pxa
galak
ceph
configfs
jfs
squashfs
vfs-scale
kconfig
ide
powertools
swiotlb
input-mt
lsm
embedded
firmware
backlight
uclinux
hdlc
lblnet
bdev
cputime
jc_docs
nommu
audit
irda
i7300_edac
gpio
xen
sfi
asm-generic
hwpoison
sysctl
slabh
scsi-post-merge

I have no problem with including trees that are only used now and then,
but if any of the above have fullfilled their need, please let me know
and I will remove them.  (In some cases being in the above list may just
mean that the proicess is not working very well and things are not being
included in linux-next before the merge window opens.)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: clean up time (pass 1)
  2011-06-01  1:06 linux-next: clean up time (pass 1) Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-06-01  1:12 ` Tejun Heo
  2011-06-01  1:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
  2011-06-02  1:26 ` Phillip Lougher
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2011-06-01  1:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML

Hello, Stephen.

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:06:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> slabh

This definitely is a dead branch.  It was a temporary testing branch
preparing for wide-scale update and the whole thing has been in
mainline for a very long time now.  Sorry about not updating it
earlier.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: clean up time (pass 1)
  2011-06-01  1:12 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2011-06-01  1:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-06-01  1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-next, LKML

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 524 bytes --]

Hi Tejun,

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:12:15 +0900 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:06:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > slabh
> 
> This definitely is a dead branch.  It was a temporary testing branch
> preparing for wide-scale update and the whole thing has been in
> mainline for a very long time now.  Sorry about not updating it
> earlier.

Thanks, I will remove it.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: clean up time (pass 1)
  2011-06-01  1:06 linux-next: clean up time (pass 1) Stephen Rothwell
  2011-06-01  1:12 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2011-06-02  1:26 ` Phillip Lougher
  2011-06-02  1:38   ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Phillip Lougher @ 2011-06-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking through the trees currently included in linux-next, I get the
> feeling that some of them may be obsolete.
>
> Here is a list of tree that had no commits in them at the openning of the
> previous two merge windows:
>
> linux-spec
> pxa
> galak
> ceph
> configfs
> jfs
> squashfs

This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs
linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window...

Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011

$ git log --pretty="%ci %s"
...
2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition
2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_
2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression
2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr
2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp
2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp
2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4

Phillip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: clean up time (pass 1)
  2011-06-02  1:26 ` Phillip Lougher
@ 2011-06-02  1:38   ` Stephen Rothwell
  2011-06-02  2:25     ` Phillip Lougher
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-06-02  1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Phillip Lougher; +Cc: linux-next, LKML

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]

Hi Phillip,

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:26:07 +0100 Phillip Lougher <phillip.lougher@gmail•com> wrote:
>
> > squashfs
> 
> This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs
> linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window...
> 
> Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011
> 
> $ git log --pretty="%ci %s"
> ...
> 2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition
> 2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_
> 2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression
> 2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr
> 2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp
> 2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp
> 2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4

plus or minus 1 day (and timezone jitter :-)):

$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110314/origin..next/20110314/squashfs | wc -l
0
$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110315/origin..next/20110315/squashfs | wc -l
0
$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110316/origin..next/20110316/squashfs | wc -l
6

It doesn't really matter, it was just a quick metric to choose a subset
of trees to look at.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: clean up time (pass 1)
  2011-06-02  1:38   ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-06-02  2:25     ` Phillip Lougher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Phillip Lougher @ 2011-06-02  2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:26:07 +0100 Phillip Lougher <phillip.lougher@gmail•com> wrote:
>>
>> > squashfs
>>
>> This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs
>> linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window...
>>
>> Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011
>>
>> $ git log --pretty="%ci %s"
>> ...
>> 2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition
>> 2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_
>> 2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression
>> 2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr
>> 2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp
>> 2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp
>> 2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4
>
> plus or minus 1 day (and timezone jitter :-)):
>
> $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110314/origin..next/20110314/squashfs | wc -l
> 0
> $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110315/origin..next/20110315/squashfs | wc -l
> 0
> $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110316/origin..next/20110316/squashfs | wc -l
> 6
>

Bugger, maybe I forgot to push, though I thought I did  :-)

Phillip

> It doesn't really matter, it was just a quick metric to choose a subset
> of trees to look at.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-02  2:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-01  1:06 linux-next: clean up time (pass 1) Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-01  1:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-01  1:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-02  1:26 ` Phillip Lougher
2011-06-02  1:38   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-02  2:25     ` Phillip Lougher

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox