* linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch tree
@ 2024-02-27 3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-17 23:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-02-27 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini, KVM, Huacai Chen
Cc: Huacai Chen, Jinyang He, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Tiezhu Yang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
arch/loongarch/Kconfig
between commit:
853f96367535 ("LoongArch: Add kernel livepatching support")
from the loongarch tree and commit:
f48212ee8e78 ("treewide: remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM")
from the kvm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/loongarch/Kconfig
index 99a0a15ce5f7,eb2139387a54..000000000000
--- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
@@@ -133,11 -133,8 +133,10 @@@ config LOONGARC
select HAVE_KPROBES
select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
select HAVE_KRETPROBES
- select HAVE_KVM
+ select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
select HAVE_NMI
+ select HAVE_OBJTOOL if AS_HAS_EXPLICIT_RELOCS
select HAVE_PCI
select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
select HAVE_PERF_REGS
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch tree
2024-02-27 3:09 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2024-03-17 23:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-03-17 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini, KVM, Huacai Chen
Cc: Huacai Chen, Jinyang He, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Tiezhu Yang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1445 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:09:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/loongarch/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 853f96367535 ("LoongArch: Add kernel livepatching support")
>
> from the loongarch tree and commit:
>
> f48212ee8e78 ("treewide: remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM")
>
> from the kvm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index 99a0a15ce5f7,eb2139387a54..000000000000
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@@ -133,11 -133,8 +133,10 @@@ config LOONGARC
> select HAVE_KPROBES
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> - select HAVE_KVM
> + select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
> select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
> select HAVE_NMI
> + select HAVE_OBJTOOL if AS_HAS_EXPLICIT_RELOCS
> select HAVE_PCI
> select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
> select HAVE_PERF_REGS
This is now a conflict between the loongarch tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch tree
@ 2024-05-15 2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-16 23:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-05-15 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini, KVM, Huacai Chen
Cc: Bibo Mao, Huacai Chen, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Tiezhu Yang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 847 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
arch/loongarch/kernel/irq.c
between commit:
5685d7fcb55f ("LoongArch: Give a chance to build with !CONFIG_SMP")
from the loongarch tree and commit:
316863cb62fe ("LoongArch/smp: Refine some ipi functions on LoongArch platform")
from the kvm tree.
I fixed it up (the latter removed a function that was made protected by
CONFIG_SMP in the former - I just removed it) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch tree
2024-05-15 2:54 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2024-05-16 23:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-05-16 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huacai Chen
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, KVM, Bibo Mao, Huacai Chen,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, Tiezhu Yang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1045 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Wed, 15 May 2024 12:54:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/loongarch/kernel/irq.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 5685d7fcb55f ("LoongArch: Give a chance to build with !CONFIG_SMP")
>
> from the loongarch tree and commit:
>
> 316863cb62fe ("LoongArch/smp: Refine some ipi functions on LoongArch platform")
>
> from the kvm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter removed a function that was made protected by
> CONFIG_SMP in the former - I just removed it) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the loongarch tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-16 23:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-27 3:09 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-17 23:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-15 2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-16 23:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox