From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation•org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google•com>,
Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google•com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups•com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:05:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250825160557.591ef4d7@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOSm2_FGfjQpUBttuUH5ZrMEqnaGkYVkN6N96wX7Qs8EE2Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5153 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:44:52 +0800 David Gow <davidgow@google•com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 00:32, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation•org> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/17/25 20:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the kunit-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > Thank you Stephen. I did a allmodconfig build on 6.17-rc1 base - didn't
> > see the error.
> >
> > Marie, David, can you take a look this. Looks like conflict with drm
> > in next?
>
> Thanks, Shuah. I've managed to reproduce this with:
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 --kunitconfig
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe
>
> These patches fix it (and a corresponding drm/xe test failure):
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20250819073434.1411114-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#t
>
> Ideally, they'll be squashed into the corresponding patches, as
> otherwise there'd be some temporary breakage during bisections. I can
> squash these into the original series and re-send it out if that works
> best for you.
>
> Cheers,
> -- David
>
> > >
> > > In file included from include/kunit/static_stub.h:18,
> > > from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:20:
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:610:48: error: initialization of 'const void * (*)(struct kunit *, const void *, char *)' from incompatible pointer type 'const void * (*)(const void *, char *)' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > > 610 | KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_ccs_migrate_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param),
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:210:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM'
> > > 210 | .generate_params = gen_params, .module_name = KBUILD_MODNAME}
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:610:48: note: (near initialization for 'xe_bo_tests[0].generate_params')
> > > 610 | KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_ccs_migrate_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param),
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:210:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM'
> > > 210 | .generate_params = gen_params, .module_name = KBUILD_MODNAME}
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:611:45: error: initialization of 'const void * (*)(struct kunit *, const void *, char *)' from incompatible pointer type 'const void * (*)(const void *, char *)' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > > 611 | KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_bo_evict_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param),
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:210:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM'
> > > 210 | .generate_params = gen_params, .module_name = KBUILD_MODNAME}
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:611:45: note: (near initialization for 'xe_bo_tests[1].generate_params')
> > > 611 | KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_bo_evict_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param),
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:210:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM'
> > > 210 | .generate_params = gen_params, .module_name = KBUILD_MODNAME}
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:624:51: error: initialization of 'const void * (*)(struct kunit *, const void *, char *)' from incompatible pointer type 'const void * (*)(const void *, char *)' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > > 624 | KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_ATTR(xe_bo_shrink_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:223:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_ATTR'
> > > 223 | .generate_params = gen_params, \
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:624:51: note: (near initialization for 'xe_bo_shrink_test[0].generate_params')
> > > 624 | KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_ATTR(xe_bo_shrink_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:223:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_ATTR'
> > > 223 | .generate_params = gen_params, \
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 444be9072fca ("kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params()")
> > >
> > > I have used the kunit-next tree from next-20250815 for today.
I am still seeing this build failure.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-18 2:08 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-18 16:32 ` Shuah Khan
2025-08-19 7:44 ` David Gow
2025-08-25 6:05 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-08-26 2:15 ` Shuah Khan
2025-08-26 9:24 ` David Gow
2025-08-27 5:49 ` Shuah Khan
2025-08-27 6:37 ` David Gow
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-04 4:11 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-04 13:26 ` Gabriela Bittencourt
2024-10-04 18:36 ` Shuah Khan
2024-02-29 4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-29 15:07 ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-01 7:15 ` David Gow
2024-03-01 10:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-01 16:05 ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-01 20:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-01 22:30 ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-06 15:25 ` Shuah Khan
2024-02-28 2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-28 3:26 ` Shuah Khan
2020-01-16 5:57 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-16 11:23 ` Alan Maguire
2020-01-16 23:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-01-10 6:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-10 11:56 ` Alan Maguire
2020-01-13 21:11 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250825160557.591ef4d7@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=davidgow@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=marievic@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox