public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree
@ 2008-08-13  4:57 Stephen Rothwell
  2008-08-13  6:19 ` Pekka Enberg
  2008-08-13  7:21 ` Pekka Enberg
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-08-13  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter
  Cc: linux-next, Randy Dunlap, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 484 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the slab tree got a conflict in
lib/Kconfig.debug between commit 3794f3e812ef707a4f7931742274d1d0ca6597b4
("docsrc: build Documentation/ sources") from Linus' tree and commit
5db80305ad7ea891246aec24204630c2925e7b12 ("kmemtrace: Core
implementation") from the slab tree.

Just a matter of overlapping additions.  I took both sets.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree
@ 2008-10-21  4:55 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-10-21  4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter
  Cc: linux-next, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Hi Pekka, Christoph,

Today's linux-next merge of the slab tree got a trivial conflict in
mm/Makefile between commit 52d4b9ac0b985168009c2a57098324e67bae171f
("memcg: allocate all page_cgroup at boot") from Linus' tree and commit
16c47ef3e86307c58149f417a6fa4925b90c7e9f ("kmemtrace: Core
implementation") from the slab tree.

Just a context change.  I fixed it up (see below).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

diff --cc mm/Makefile
index c06b45a,7f42d55..0000000
--- a/mm/Makefile
+++ b/mm/Makefile
@@@ -33,4 -33,5 +33,5 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_FS_XIP) += filemap_xip.
  obj-$(CONFIG_MIGRATION) += migrate.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += allocpercpu.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_QUICKLIST) += quicklist.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR) += memcontrol.o
 +obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR) += memcontrol.o page_cgroup.o
+ obj-$(CONFIG_KMEMTRACE) += kmemtrace.o

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree
@ 2008-11-03  4:07 Stephen Rothwell
  2008-11-03  9:38 ` Pekka Enberg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-11-03  4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter; +Cc: linux-next, Alexey Dobriyan

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the slab tree got a conflict in
fs/proc/inode.c between commit 5bcd7ff9e1690dbdbccb2a1cb3c2ea8b8381c435
("proc: proc_init_inodecache() can't fail") from Linus' tree and commit
f7f650b4b85ad364072936db9e6beddcb2ca33b8 ("Filesystem: /proc filesystem
support for slab defrag") from the slab tree.

It is just a context change. I fixed it up (see below) and will carry the
fix for a couple of days (during which time it will hopefully be fixed in
your tree).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

diff --cc fs/proc/inode.c
index 2543fd0,54f8137..0000000
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@@ -106,13 -106,22 +106,21 @@@ static void init_once(void *foo
  	inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
  }
  
+ static void *proc_get_inodes(struct kmem_cache *s, int nr, void **v)
+ {
+ 	return fs_get_inodes(s, nr, v,
+ 		offsetof(struct proc_inode, vfs_inode));
+ };
+ 
 -int __init proc_init_inodecache(void)
 +void __init proc_init_inodecache(void)
  {
  	proc_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("proc_inode_cache",
  					     sizeof(struct proc_inode),
  					     0, (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|
  						SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_PANIC),
  					     init_once);
+ 	kmem_cache_setup_defrag(proc_inode_cachep,
+ 				proc_get_inodes, kick_inodes);
 -	return 0;
  }
  
  static const struct super_operations proc_sops = {

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree
@ 2008-11-03  4:19 Stephen Rothwell
  2008-11-03  4:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
  2008-11-03  9:39 ` Pekka Enberg
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-11-03  4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter
  Cc: linux-next, Rik van Riel, Lee Schermerhorn, KOSAKI Motohiro,
	Hugh Dickins, Daisuke Nishimura, Andrew Morton

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the slab tree got a conflict in mm/vmscan.c
between commit 4f98a2fee8acdb4ac84545df98cccecfd130f8db ("vmscan: split
LRU lists into anon & file sets") from Linus' tree and commit
9fb8a023ad432b0ca884790a8a05991180ab42b6 ("slub: Trigger defragmentation
from memory reclaim") from the slab tree.

Overlapping changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and will carry the fix
for a few days (during which time I hope it will be fixed in the slab
tree).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

diff --cc mm/vmscan.c
index 3b58602,b72cb36..0000000
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@@ -2095,7 -1932,7 +2144,7 @@@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigne
  
  			reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
  			shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, sc.gfp_mask,
- 					global_lru_pages());
 -					count_lru_pages(), NULL);
++					global_lru_pages(), NULL);
  			ret += reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab;
  			if (ret >= nr_pages)
  				goto out;
@@@ -2112,7 -1949,7 +2161,7 @@@
  	if (!ret) {
  		do {
  			reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
- 			shrink_slab(nr_pages, sc.gfp_mask, global_lru_pages());
 -			shrink_slab(nr_pages, sc.gfp_mask, count_lru_pages(), NULL);
++			shrink_slab(nr_pages, sc.gfp_mask, global_lru_pages(), NULL);
  			ret += reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab;
  		} while (ret < nr_pages && reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab > 0);
  	}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree
@ 2008-11-03  4:26 Stephen Rothwell
  2008-11-03  9:39 ` Pekka Enberg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-11-03  4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter
  Cc: linux-next, Rik van Riel, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, Andrew Morton,
	KOSAKI Motohiro

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the slab tree got a conflict in mm/vmstat.c
between commit 556adecba110bf5f1db6c6b56416cfab5bcab698 ("vmscan: second
chance replacement for anonymous pages") from Linus' tree and commit
9fb8a023ad432b0ca884790a8a05991180ab42b6 ("slub: Trigger defragmentation
from memory reclaim") from the slab tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and will carry the fix
for a few days (during which time I hope it is fixed in the slab tree).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb•auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

diff --cc mm/vmstat.c
index 022418e,5efc2c5..0000000
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@@ -774,14 -731,14 +774,16 @@@ static void zoneinfo_show_print(struct 
  #endif
  	}
  	seq_printf(m,
+ 		   "\n  slab_defrag_count: %lu"
  		   "\n  all_unreclaimable: %u"
  		   "\n  prev_priority:     %i"
 -		   "\n  start_pfn:         %lu",
 +		   "\n  start_pfn:         %lu"
 +		   "\n  inactive_ratio:    %u",
- 			   zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone),
+ 			zone->slab_defrag_counter,
+ 			zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone),
  		   zone->prev_priority,
 -		   zone->zone_start_pfn);
 +		   zone->zone_start_pfn,
 +		   zone->inactive_ratio);
  	seq_putc(m, '\n');
  }
  

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-03  9:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-13  4:57 linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13  6:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13  7:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13  7:10     ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13  7:36       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13  7:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13  7:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-21  4:55 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03  4:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03  9:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-03  4:19 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03  4:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-03  9:39 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-03  4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03  9:39 ` Pekka Enberg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox