* linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 @ 2011-09-06 6:40 Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-06 17:17 ` Arnaud Lacombe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-06 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-next; +Cc: LKML [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 278 bytes --] Hi all, With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no tree today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-06 6:40 linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-06 17:17 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-06 17:23 ` Josh Boyer 2011-09-07 7:16 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-06 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML Hi, On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and > I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no > tree today. > What about github ? gitorious ? If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. Thanks, - Arnaud ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-06 17:17 ` Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-06 17:23 ` Josh Boyer 2011-09-06 17:29 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-07 7:16 ` Stephen Rothwell 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Josh Boyer @ 2011-09-06 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaud Lacombe; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, LKML On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and >> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no >> tree today. >> > What about github ? gitorious ? > > If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk > usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next tree at best. Probably better to just wait. josh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-06 17:23 ` Josh Boyer @ 2011-09-06 17:29 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-06 17:37 ` Randy Dunlap 2011-09-06 18:18 ` Josh Boyer 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-06 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Josh Boyer; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, LKML Hi, On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail•com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and >>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no >>> tree today. >>> >> What about github ? gitorious ? >> >> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk >> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. > > Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next > pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot > of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next > tree at best. Probably better to just wait. > That's just insane... git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development should just not be impacted by such issues. - Arnaud ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-06 17:29 ` Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-06 17:37 ` Randy Dunlap 2011-09-06 18:18 ` Josh Boyer 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2011-09-06 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaud Lacombe; +Cc: Josh Boyer, Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, LKML On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:29:23 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail•com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and > >>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no > >>> tree today. > >>> > >> What about github ? gitorious ? > >> > >> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk > >> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. > > > > Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next > > pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot > > of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next > > tree at best. Probably better to just wait. > > > That's just insane... > > git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development > should just not be impacted by such issues. Key word is "should," but reality intervenes. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-06 17:29 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-06 17:37 ` Randy Dunlap @ 2011-09-06 18:18 ` Josh Boyer 2011-09-06 18:30 ` Arnaud Lacombe 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Josh Boyer @ 2011-09-06 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaud Lacombe; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, LKML On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail•com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and >>>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no >>>> tree today. >>>> >>> What about github ? gitorious ? >>> >>> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk >>> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. >> >> Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next >> pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot >> of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next >> tree at best. Probably better to just wait. >> > That's just insane... It's insane for people to host their git trees for kernel work on kernel.org? > git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development > should just not be impacted by such issues. No... git is still used in a distributed fashion. It's just that most maintainers host the public trees that people pull from on kernel.org. Some have pushed public trees to github or elsewhere, but not all of them. josh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-06 18:18 ` Josh Boyer @ 2011-09-06 18:30 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-07 14:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-06 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Josh Boyer; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, LKML Hi, On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail•com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail•com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and >>>>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no >>>>> tree today. >>>>> >>>> What about github ? gitorious ? >>>> >>>> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk >>>> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. >>> >>> Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next >>> pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot >>> of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next >>> tree at best. Probably better to just wait. >>> >> That's just insane... > > It's insane for people to host their git trees for kernel work on kernel.org? > Yes. It is looking for trouble by creating a wonderful single point of failure. Which happened to have failed. If I were to be really paranoid, I would no longer trust any code on git.kernel.org unless all the current repository were to be destroyed, and re-uploaded by their owner. - Arnaud >> git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development >> should just not be impacted by such issues. > > No... git is still used in a distributed fashion. It's just that most > maintainers host the public trees that people pull from on kernel.org. > Some have pushed public trees to github or elsewhere, but not all of > them. > > josh > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-06 18:30 ` Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-07 14:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-09-11 4:19 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2011-09-07 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaud Lacombe; +Cc: Josh Boyer, Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, LKML Em 06-09-2011 15:30, Arnaud Lacombe escreveu: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail•com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail•com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and >>>>>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no >>>>>> tree today. >>>>>> >>>>> What about github ? gitorious ? >>>>> >>>>> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk >>>>> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. >>>> >>>> Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next >>>> pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot >>>> of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next >>>> tree at best. Probably better to just wait. >>>> >>> That's just insane... >> >> It's insane for people to host their git trees for kernel work on kernel.org? >> > Yes. It is looking for trouble by creating a wonderful single point of > failure. Which happened to have failed. It seems that we need a backup plan. In my case, I could put the tree for -next at infradead or at linuxtv, but that means to re-configure everything at Stephen's side. Does anyone have an ETA for hera to come back to live? If they're planning to recover it into one or two days, then it is probably better to wait. Otherwise, I think it would be wiser to move the repo to some other place while they're preparing a new infrastructure. > If I were to be really paranoid, I would no longer trust any code on > git.kernel.org unless all the current repository were to be destroyed, > and re-uploaded by their owner. In any case, I'll just do a push -f after hera return, and do a git repack -A -d on my repository there, to remove any bad object that might be inserted by someone's else. > > - Arnaud > >>> git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development >>> should just not be impacted by such issues. >> >> No... git is still used in a distributed fashion. It's just that most >> maintainers host the public trees that people pull from on kernel.org. >> Some have pushed public trees to github or elsewhere, but not all of >> them. >> >> josh >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger•kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-07 14:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2011-09-11 4:19 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-22 1:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-11 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; +Cc: Arnaud Lacombe, Josh Boyer, linux-next, LKML [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 588 bytes --] Hi Mauro, On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:08:53 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead•org> wrote: > > It seems that we need a backup plan. In my case, I could put the tree > for -next at infradead or at linuxtv, but that means to re-configure > everything at Stephen's side. That is not a big issue at all. If you wish to move your tree, just let me know (preferably in a public manner to raise my confidence in its provenance - I am a bit more paranoid, now :-)). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-11 4:19 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-22 1:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-09-22 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2011-09-22 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Arnaud Lacombe, Josh Boyer, linux-next, LKML Em 11-09-2011 01:19, Stephen Rothwell escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:08:53 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead•org> wrote: >> >> It seems that we need a backup plan. In my case, I could put the tree >> for -next at infradead or at linuxtv, but that means to re-configure >> everything at Stephen's side. > > That is not a big issue at all. If you wish to move your tree, just let > me know (preferably in a public manner to raise my confidence in its > provenance - I am a bit more paranoid, now :-)). Hi Stephen, Please replace my media tree (v4l-dvb) by this one: git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git I'll set soon a new tree for my edac patches as well. Thank you! Mauro ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-22 1:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2011-09-22 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-22 2:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-22 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; +Cc: Arnaud Lacombe, Josh Boyer, linux-next, LKML [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 437 bytes --] Hi Mauro, On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:54:12 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead•org> wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > Please replace my media tree (v4l-dvb) by this one: > git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git I have switched to this from today. > I'll set soon a new tree for my edac patches as well. OK -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-22 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-22 2:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-09-22 14:26 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2011-09-22 2:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Randy Dunlap, linux-next Em 21-09-2011 23:23, Stephen Rothwell escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:54:12 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead•org> wrote: >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Please replace my media tree (v4l-dvb) by this one: >> git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git > > I have switched to this from today. Thank you! >> I'll set soon a new tree for my edac patches as well. > > OK > Ok, just set a git tree for the edac drivers I'm maintaining. It is at: git://git.infradead.org/users/mchehab/edac.git It replaces both my old i7core and edac trees. Could you please replace it for the linux-next builds? It contains the fix for the compilation error on i386, as reported by Randy. Thanks! Mauro ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-22 2:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2011-09-22 14:26 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-22 17:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-22 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; +Cc: Randy Dunlap, linux-next [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 518 bytes --] Hi Mauro, On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:48:45 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead•org> wrote: > > Ok, just set a git tree for the edac drivers I'm maintaining. > It is at: > git://git.infradead.org/users/mchehab/edac.git > > It replaces both my old i7core and edac trees. I will switch to this starting tomorrow. It is called edac and I have removed the i7core_edac and i7300_edac trees. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-22 14:26 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-22 17:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2011-09-22 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Randy Dunlap, linux-next Em 22-09-2011 11:26, Stephen Rothwell escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:48:45 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead•org> wrote: >> >> Ok, just set a git tree for the edac drivers I'm maintaining. >> It is at: >> git://git.infradead.org/users/mchehab/edac.git >> >> It replaces both my old i7core and edac trees. > > I will switch to this starting tomorrow. It is called edac and I have > removed the i7core_edac and i7300_edac trees. OK! Thank you! Mauro ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 2011-09-06 17:17 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-06 17:23 ` Josh Boyer @ 2011-09-07 7:16 ` Stephen Rothwell 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-07 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaud Lacombe; +Cc: linux-next, LKML [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 631 bytes --] Hi Arnaud, On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:17:21 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail•com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and > > I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no > > tree today. > > > What about github ? gitorious ? I am restricted by my employer as to where I can publish the linux-next tree. Besides, I am having a nice restful time :-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb•auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-22 17:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-09-06 6:40 linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-06 17:17 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-06 17:23 ` Josh Boyer 2011-09-06 17:29 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-06 17:37 ` Randy Dunlap 2011-09-06 18:18 ` Josh Boyer 2011-09-06 18:30 ` Arnaud Lacombe 2011-09-07 14:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-09-11 4:19 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-22 1:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-09-22 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-22 2:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-09-22 14:26 ` Stephen Rothwell 2011-09-22 17:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-09-07 7:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox