public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner•de>
To: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux•ibm.com>
Cc: 18255117159@163•com, bhelgaas@google•com, helgaas@kernel•org,
	agordeev@linux•ibm.com, borntraeger@linux•ibm.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux•intel.com, jingoohan1@gmail•com,
	kwilczynski@kernel•org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger•kernel.org, linux-next@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger•kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel•org,
	mani@kernel•org, robh@kernel•org, schnelle@linux•ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Fix endianness issues in pci_bus_read_config()
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:53:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIu7uO4NOanxMfAO@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731173858.1173442-1-gbayer@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 07:38:58PM +0200, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> Simple pointer-casts to map byte and word reads from PCI config space
> into dwords (i.e. u32) produce unintended results on big-endian systems.
> Add the necessary adjustments under compile-time switch
> CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN.
> 
> pci_bus_read_config() was just introduced with
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250716161203.83823-2-18255117159@163.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux•ibm.com>
> ---
> Sorry to spill this endianness aware code into drivers/pci, feel free to
> suggest a cleaner approach. This has fixed the issues seen on s390 systems

PCI is little-endian.  On big-endian systems, the endianness conversion
of Config Space accesses happens transparently in the struct pci_ops
->read() and ->write() callbacks.  E.g. on s390, zpci_cfg_load() and
zpci_cfg_store() call le64_to_cpu() and cpu_to_le64(), respectively.

We do not want to mess with endianness in the PCI core, so this isn't
a proper fix IMO.

A viable approach might be to turn pci_bus_read_config() into a macro
in include/linux/pci.h which calls the byte/word/dword variant based
on sizeof(*val) or something like that.

But at this point, with the merge window already open, it's probably
better to drop the pci/capability-search topic branch from the pull
request and retry in the next cycle.

> Since this is still sitting in the a pull-request for upstream,
> I'm not sure if this warrants a Fixes: tag.

In cases like this, do include a Fixes tag but no stable designation.

Thanks,

Lukas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-31 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250716231121.GA2564572@bhelgaas>
2025-07-31  7:32 ` [REGRESSION] next/master: suspect endianness issue in common PCI capability search macro Gerd Bayer
2025-07-31 17:38   ` [PATCH] PCI: Fix endianness issues in pci_bus_read_config() Gerd Bayer
2025-07-31 18:39     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-31 19:01       ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-08-01  8:18         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-01  9:25           ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-01  9:47             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-01 10:06               ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-01 10:54                 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-01 11:30                   ` Gerd Bayer
2025-08-01 16:54                     ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-01 18:08                       ` Keith Busch
2025-08-02 15:23                         ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-02 15:40                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-08-04  3:06                     ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-04  8:03                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-08-04  8:25                         ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-04 10:09                       ` Gerd Bayer
2025-08-12 14:44                         ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-13  7:47                           ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-08-13  7:50                             ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-04 14:33                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-04 15:04                         ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-01 16:47                   ` Hans Zhang
2025-07-31 18:53     ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-08-01  7:52     ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aIu7uO4NOanxMfAO@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner$(echo .)de \
    --cc=18255117159@163$(echo .)com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=mani@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=robh@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=schnelle@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox