* Re: timebase interrupts on an mpc8xx
[not found] <20030527200329.D7EEFC6162@atlas.denx.de>
@ 2003-05-28 11:12 ` Dan Malek
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dan Malek @ 2003-05-28 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: Seb James, rtai, linuxppc-dev
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I disagree. I think Wolfgang Grandegger is right;
Sorry, I didn't see any other replies to this message.
> ... it's caused by
> reading sivec without a pending interrupt.
What? That had been updated a long time ago, is it missing again?
> BTW: it seems the interrupt handling code becomes worse. I guess you
> don't care about this any more?
I care alot. There have been changes I have totally disagreed with,
but they were checked in anyway. Not much I can do about it but hope
I get time to fix it in the future.
> ... At least it was working when you
> did... Now the 2_4_devel code is crap.
I agree, but it wasn't my choice. People that don't even use the code
seemed to this was the way to go..........
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-05-28 11:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20030527200329.D7EEFC6162@atlas.denx.de>
2003-05-28 11:12 ` timebase interrupts on an mpc8xx Dan Malek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox