public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Sieka <tur@semihalf•com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab•ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F60D5D.5090402@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F22C9A.4050501@semihalf.com>

Bartlomiej Sieka wrote:
> Hi Grant,
> 
> Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka <tur@semihalf•com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Grant Likely wrote:
>>>  > The one part that I have a really strong opinion on is that there
>>>  > should be a full featured mpc5200 defconfig for build testing.  
>>> Beyond
>>>  > that (and if ojn can also be appeased) I can probably be 
>>> convinced.  :-)
>>>
>>>  Hi Grant,
>>>
>>>  How to deal with a situation where I need a particular PHY driver from
>>>  libphy compiled in the kernel for one of the MPC5200 boards? Adding it
>>>  to mpc5200_defconfig doesn't seem like a right thing to do.
>>
>> Why not?  mpc5200_defconfig is all about compile and runtime testing
>> on many platforms to make sure drivers play well together.  I have no
>> problem adding more drivers to the mpc5200 defconfig.  (In fact, I
>> encourage it).
>>
>>>  How to
>>>  convince you (and appease ojn) to accept a patch that adds a
>>>  board-specific defconfig that only slightly differs from
>>>  mpc5200_defconfig? :)
>>
>> I'm thinking 'optimized' defconfigs should go into a subdirectory.
> 
> This requires a change to the top-level Makefile and shepherding this
> change upstream. Could we perhaps try to avoid this by having optimized
> defconfigs in the form of, for example:
> 
> arch/powerpc/configs/tqm5200_opt_defconfig
> arch/powerpc/configs/motionpro_opt_defconfig
> 
> Or, to signify what is the base defconfig:
> 
> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200_tqm5200_defconfig
> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200_motionpro_defconfig
> 
> or even:
> 
> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200_opt_tqm5200_defconfig
> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200_opt_motionpro_defconfig
> 
> Would patch adding an optimized _defconfig along these lines be accepted?

Grant,

Any thoughts on the above?

Regards,
Bartlomiej

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-04 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-24  7:35 Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git Grant Likely
     [not found] ` <47DE94F4.90804@semihalf.com>
2008-03-17 19:19   ` Grant Likely
2008-03-17 20:59     ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-03-17 21:43       ` Grant Likely
2008-03-17 22:28         ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-03-17 23:43           ` Grant Likely
2008-03-18  0:26             ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-03-18  2:42               ` Grant Likely
2008-03-18 12:20                 ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-18  8:29             ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-18 10:04               ` Richard Purdie
2008-03-25 15:29                 ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-18 14:47               ` Grant Likely
2008-03-18 16:41                 ` Richard Purdie
2008-03-18 16:53                   ` Grant Likely
2008-03-25 16:50                     ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-25 18:49                       ` Grant Likely
2008-03-25 17:38             ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-25 18:51               ` Grant Likely
2008-04-01 12:37                 ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-04-04 11:13                   ` Bartlomiej Sieka [this message]
2008-04-04 16:11                     ` Grant Likely
2008-04-04 16:14                       ` Grant Likely
2008-04-04 16:38                         ` Olof Johansson
2008-04-04 17:15                           ` Josh Boyer
2008-04-04 17:25                             ` Grant Likely
2008-04-15 10:34                       ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-18  7:57     ` Bartlomiej Sieka
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-09 23:09 Grant Likely
2008-11-14 19:20 Grant Likely
2008-11-24  3:38 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-11-24 14:41   ` Grant Likely
2008-05-01 18:04 Grant Likely
2008-04-29 13:34 Grant Likely
2007-10-16 23:22 Grant Likely
2007-10-17 10:27 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-10-17 13:13   ` Grant Likely
2007-10-10 16:30 Grant Likely
2007-10-11 17:35 ` tnt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47F60D5D.5090402@semihalf.com \
    --to=tur@semihalf$(echo .)com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab$(echo .)ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox