public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Sieka <tur@semihalf•com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab•ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:38:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E938A8.9000103@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40803171643y7db21cadsc454a713ba6c4342@mail.gmail.com>

Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
> (copied from my comments in an off-list conversation)
> 
> However, I have declined (for now) to pick up the defconfigs for those
> boards and instead merged in the config features they require into the
> mpc5200 defconfig.  My primary reason for doing so is to increase the
> likelyhood that full featured kernels are built and tested so that
> situations where board ports conflict with each other are caught and
> fixed.
> 
> ojn has also been complaining about the number of defconfigs he needs
> to build to test all the powerpc configurations without any
> indications about which ones are important and which ones are not.
> There has been some discussion about having a subdirectory for
> optimized board configs, but nobody has done anything about it yet.
> 
> The one part that I have a really strong opinion on is that there
> should be a full featured mpc5200 defconfig for build testing.  Beyond
> that (and if ojn can also be appeased) I can probably be convinced.  :-)

Hi Grant,

How to deal with a situation where I need a particular PHY driver from
libphy compiled in the kernel for one of the MPC5200 boards? Adding it
to mpc5200_defconfig doesn't seem like a right thing to do. How to
convince you (and appease ojn) to accept a patch that adds a
board-specific defconfig that only slightly differs from
mpc5200_defconfig? :)

Regards,
Bartlomiej

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-25 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-24  7:35 Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git Grant Likely
     [not found] ` <47DE94F4.90804@semihalf.com>
2008-03-17 19:19   ` Grant Likely
2008-03-17 20:59     ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-03-17 21:43       ` Grant Likely
2008-03-17 22:28         ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-03-17 23:43           ` Grant Likely
2008-03-18  0:26             ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-03-18  2:42               ` Grant Likely
2008-03-18 12:20                 ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-18  8:29             ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-18 10:04               ` Richard Purdie
2008-03-25 15:29                 ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-18 14:47               ` Grant Likely
2008-03-18 16:41                 ` Richard Purdie
2008-03-18 16:53                   ` Grant Likely
2008-03-25 16:50                     ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-25 18:49                       ` Grant Likely
2008-03-25 17:38             ` Bartlomiej Sieka [this message]
2008-03-25 18:51               ` Grant Likely
2008-04-01 12:37                 ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-04-04 11:13                   ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-04-04 16:11                     ` Grant Likely
2008-04-04 16:14                       ` Grant Likely
2008-04-04 16:38                         ` Olof Johansson
2008-04-04 17:15                           ` Josh Boyer
2008-04-04 17:25                             ` Grant Likely
2008-04-15 10:34                       ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-03-18  7:57     ` Bartlomiej Sieka
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-09 23:09 Grant Likely
2008-11-14 19:20 Grant Likely
2008-11-24  3:38 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-11-24 14:41   ` Grant Likely
2008-05-01 18:04 Grant Likely
2008-04-29 13:34 Grant Likely
2007-10-16 23:22 Grant Likely
2007-10-17 10:27 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-10-17 13:13   ` Grant Likely
2007-10-10 16:30 Grant Likely
2007-10-11 17:35 ` tnt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47E938A8.9000103@semihalf.com \
    --to=tur@semihalf$(echo .)com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab$(echo .)ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox