From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti•com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix•de>
Cc: <netdev@vger•kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix•de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely on netif_running() to check which device is active
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:05:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51711E0B.4000306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516FE2AD.2040403@linutronix.de>
On 4/18/2013 5:40 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 01:50 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> index 3b22a36..c32780d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ struct cpsw_priv {
>>> int host_port;
>>> struct clk *clk;
>>> u8 mac_addr[ETH_ALEN];
>>> + u8 active;
>> Frame work is providing this feature then why you need to have additional
>> book keeping in device private?
> Which function? I more than happy to use it.
>
The same netif_running(). But why you are telling not to rely on this API?
device state is updated immediately after successful ndo_open.
Regards
Mugunthan V N
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 21:52 my small cpsw queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] net/davinci_cpdma: don't check for jiffies with interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:49 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:40 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 8:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely on netif_running() to check which device is active Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:35 ` Mugunthan V N [this message]
2013-04-22 8:30 ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] net/cpsw: don't rely only " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 9:14 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 9:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 9:40 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 9:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 10:12 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 10:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 19:21 ` David Miller
2013-04-19 13:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely " Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-22 8:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/davinci_cpdma: remove unused argument in cpdma_chan_submit() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:51 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] net/cpsw: redo rx skb allocation in rx path Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:28 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 14:59 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51711E0B.4000306@ti.com \
--to=mugunthanvnm@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox