public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks•com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail•com>
Cc: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu•com>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	"Jiří Pírko" <jiri@resnulli•us>,
	"alexander.h.duyck@redhat•com" <alexander.h.duyck@redhat•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] netdevice: add IPv4 fib add/del ops
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 07:31:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FC5D56.3090702@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE4R7bAcfJ8M0eQMdZdS3aDgPVWSQznABZymGq+PU34vJx1suA@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/6/15, 11:59 AM, Scott Feldman wrote:
>
> I considered passing netlink flags in to driver, but the kernel logic
> in fib_table_insert() already takes care of the checks required by the
> flags, and from the driver's perspective, only three ops are needed:
> add, del, and mod.  And I've combined add and mod into the same op,
> with the assumption the driver can know if an entry exists or not.
>
> Can it work?
>
> Let's try the various user cmds and see what happens:
>
> ip route add ...             CREATE|EXCL
>
>      if kernel FIB entry exists
>          return -EEXIST to user
>      else
>          call driver add op
>          add kernel FIB entry
>
> ip route change ...        REPLACE
>
>      if kernel FIB entry exists
>          call driver add op             // driver treats this as a mod
>          modify kernel FIB entry
>      else
>          return -ENOENT
>
> ip route replace ...         CREATE|REPLACE
>
>      if kernel FIB entry exists
>           call driver add op             // driver treats this as a mod
>           modify kernel FIB entry
>      else
>          call driver add op
>          add kernel FIB entry
>
> ip route prepend ...        CREATE
>
>      if kernel FIB entry exists
>           call driver add op             // driver treats this as a mod
>           prepend kernel FIB entry
>      else
>          call driver add op
>          add kernel FIB entry
>
> ip route append ...          CREATE|APPEND
>
>      if kernel FIB entry exists
>           call driver add op             // driver treats this as a mod
>           append kernel FIB entry
>      else
>          call driver add op
>          add kernel FIB entry
>
>
> I'm not 100% on the prepend/append cases.  Maybe don't try to offload
> prepend/append cases?
We will have to offload prepend/append cases as well (I had also raised 
this earlier in v2).
  And, I dont see a problem passing the flags to the driver in the ndo op.

Thanks,
Roopa

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-08 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-06  5:21 [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] switchdev: add IPv4 routing offload sfeldma
2015-03-06  5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/8] rtnetlink: add RTNH_F_EXTERNAL flag for fib offload sfeldma
2015-03-06  5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] netdevice: add IPv4 fib add/del ops sfeldma
2015-03-06 14:55   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2015-03-06 19:59     ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-08 14:31       ` roopa [this message]
2015-03-08 22:16         ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-09  6:22           ` roopa
2015-03-09  8:38             ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-09 13:47       ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2015-03-09 18:07         ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-06  5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] switchdev: add IPv4 fib ndo ops wrappers sfeldma
2015-03-06  5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/8] switchdev: don't support custom ip rules, for now sfeldma
2015-03-06  5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/8] switchdev: implement IPv4 fib ndo wrappers sfeldma
2015-03-06  7:24   ` Jiri Pirko
2015-03-06  9:38     ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-06 11:53       ` Jiri Pirko
2015-03-06  5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] ipv4: add net bool fib_offload_disabled sfeldma
2015-03-06  5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/8] fib: hook IPv4 fib for hardware offload sfeldma
2015-03-06  5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] rocker: implement IPv4 fib offloading sfeldma
2015-03-06  5:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] switchdev: add IPv4 routing offload David Miller
2015-03-06 15:43 ` Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54FC5D56.3090702@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --to=roopa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sfeldma@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox