From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu•com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail•com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
"Jiří Pírko" <jiri@resnulli•us>,
"Roopa Prabhu" <roopa@cumulusnetworks•com>,
"alexander.h.duyck@redhat•com" <alexander.h.duyck@redhat•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] netdevice: add IPv4 fib add/del ops
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:47:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FDA458.6040601@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE4R7bAcfJ8M0eQMdZdS3aDgPVWSQznABZymGq+PU34vJx1suA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/06/15 14:59, Scott Feldman wrote:
>
> I considered passing netlink flags in to driver, but the kernel logic
> in fib_table_insert() already takes care of the checks required by the
> flags, and from the driver's perspective, only three ops are needed:
> add, del, and mod. And I've combined add and mod into the same op,
> with the assumption the driver can know if an entry exists or not.
>
That assumption is not accurate. At least in some hardware i am working
on right now a mod is cheaper than a create (and if i have to "know"
wheter i should create or modify then i actually i have to query the
hardware).
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-09 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-06 5:21 [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] switchdev: add IPv4 routing offload sfeldma
2015-03-06 5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/8] rtnetlink: add RTNH_F_EXTERNAL flag for fib offload sfeldma
2015-03-06 5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] netdevice: add IPv4 fib add/del ops sfeldma
2015-03-06 14:55 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2015-03-06 19:59 ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-08 14:31 ` roopa
2015-03-08 22:16 ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-09 6:22 ` roopa
2015-03-09 8:38 ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-09 13:47 ` Jamal Hadi Salim [this message]
2015-03-09 18:07 ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-06 5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] switchdev: add IPv4 fib ndo ops wrappers sfeldma
2015-03-06 5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/8] switchdev: don't support custom ip rules, for now sfeldma
2015-03-06 5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/8] switchdev: implement IPv4 fib ndo wrappers sfeldma
2015-03-06 7:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-03-06 9:38 ` Scott Feldman
2015-03-06 11:53 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-03-06 5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] ipv4: add net bool fib_offload_disabled sfeldma
2015-03-06 5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/8] fib: hook IPv4 fib for hardware offload sfeldma
2015-03-06 5:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 8/8] rocker: implement IPv4 fib offloading sfeldma
2015-03-06 5:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] switchdev: add IPv4 routing offload David Miller
2015-03-06 15:43 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54FDA458.6040601@mojatatu.com \
--to=jhs@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
--cc=sfeldma@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox