public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg•org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: Add SPEAr pinctrl drivers
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:43:39 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7B7D1B.7030507@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZYccTvHEMa=4=-uoLZYQxEPS+932UPA7MGc+-94eLc6w@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/03/2012 03:24 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de> wrote:
> 
>> The initialization order dependencies can now be handled using
>> the deferred probe mechanism, by returning -EPROBE_DEFER from
>> the probe() function of any driver that is loaded before its
>> pins are available.
> 
> So how do I as a driver writer do that?
> 
> Example: drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.c:
> 
> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> 
> probe() {
>        if (sirfport->hw_flow_ctrl) {
>                 sirfport->p = pinctrl_get_select_default(&pdev->dev);
>                 ret = IS_ERR(sirfport->p);
>                 if (ret)
>                         goto pin_err;
>         }
> 
> pin_err:
>     (...)
>    return ret;
> 
> So basically the pinctrl subsystem needs to return -EPROBE_DEFER
> to the driver in this case, so it can escalate that further.

Yes, I believe so.

There should be a couple of comments in pinctrl now (well, perhaps some
of them aren't there yet until my DT patches are applied!) that indicate
where -EPROBE_DEFER should be returned.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-03 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <a1b7f612544a09989cec80a0318f35b6e48eb1d3.1333453148.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>
2012-04-03 13:47 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: Add SPEAr pinctrl drivers Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-03 14:10   ` viresh kumar
2012-04-03 17:09     ` viresh kumar
2012-04-03 19:33       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-04  4:14         ` Viresh Kumar
2012-04-03 16:19   ` Stephen Warren
2012-04-03 19:37     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-03 21:24   ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-03 22:43     ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-04-10  7:54       ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-04  7:45     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-03 21:18 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-04  4:17   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F7B7D1B.7030507@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox